Philosophy Podium: Civilizational Conspiracies:

Egoist, Hero, and Liberty

THE IDEA THAT A PHARAOH IS A SACRED personality that represents the human moral and spiritual qualities can appear difficult to understand. We have only to observe historical fact and we will see that a pharaoh is important enough for all the Judeo-Christian religions to make him the so-called reasons of the exodus, or the representation of the so-called oppression inflicted on the man that adores his God; this is not to know the procedure through which a Pharaoh is elected to his throne. Since the last millennia before the Gregorian calendar, humanity has seen the birth of small kingdoms that viewed the position of the Pharaoh as a sociopolitical post. There has not been a king in the territories from actual Europe and the Middle East that did not believe that by conquering the pharoanic capitols like Wast (Thebes), Abut (Elephantine), etc., and by proclaiming themselves Pharaoh, they will not be seen as the greatest power of humanity. The reason why all of them had to abandon their desire to usurp the title of Pharaoh surely cannot be attributed to wisdom. What modern history has obscured is that each one of them died sometimes just a few weeks after they proclaimed themselves Pharaohs! The famous Alexander the Great died only 2 months after he declared himself the master of the land of the Gods. Many Ptolemys succeeded each other in a very short period to the point that none of the family old enough to rule survived, and the rest had to flee the land of the Gods. One can also see that the Mongolian army, after conquering most of Europe, set out towards Kemet, but they were at the doors of Itoure when they were informed that their powerful king just died. They returned home. Prior to modern society's emergence, the Ancient system of human civilization was based on this one principle: if there is a reason for a human being to live in this world to which he did not ask to be born and from which he does not have means to stop himself from dying as a way to leave it, we must recognize that this world does not belong to us. From all the logics we can form, there is only one that is standing strong: the passage on this Earth is a period of experience and a test. The question of knowing why the Gods or even the existence will test us will bring us to the goal the ancient human being had set for himself: acquiring the divine qualities, coming as close to the Gods as possible, and experiencing the world of the Gods. To reach this goal we must improve our moral and spiritual qualities (77 commandments). We must be pure at heart, pure in the spirit, and pure in the body; we must separate ourselves from the animal within us...and just one single passage on Earth will not enough for that. The Gods then gave us the capability for reincarnation...

This is, in short, what the human being that is in search of divine enlightenment knows. He knows that the quality of his soul will depend on his actions on Earth and not on the reason for such action. He also knows that his chance to reincarnate as a human being will depend on the life he has lived here and now. Every instant is a now and every place is here.

The human being that is not corrupted by the modern system through its doctrines and religions has what we call forbidden territories, which are determined by moral and spiritual values. He would prefer death rather than to commit these acts.

For him, he will prefer being a victim instead of a criminal. The seventy-seven commandments are sacred to him. These principles makes him a person that is not subject to the manipulations of the social politics. 

At the emergence of the Greco-Roman political system, the kings quickly realized that the populations were giving priority to the Gods and the fate of their souls after death more than to the magistrate of the leaders of the social politics. The Greeks called these people egoists, meaning those who are more preoccupied by the survival after death than the glory of the earthly empire which the Greco-Romans were attempting to create. The egoists were then persecuted and killed. They were hated. If they were interested that much in their life after death, to kill them was to send them to the world they were interested in.

The opposite of the egoist was what the Greeks called the Hero. The hero is the one that sacrifices himself at the social alter so that the ambitions of the political leaders of the society can materialize. He will kill. He will steal. He will betray, etc. he will dance, etc. He will be a comedian and entertain the public if this is needed. The social politics will reward him with praise, monuments, mausoleums, etc.

It is important to see that the hero is a creation of a dualistic mentality, very intelligently designed by a political environment which leads an individual into seeing himself as a product of one group instead of the other. The existence of people that, in one way or another, turn their backs to the evolution towards the world of the Gods is, by itself, the expression of the power of the political leaders. Spiritually, the social hero is nothing but a victim incapable of understanding the importance of the individual quality. It then becomes very easy for this hero to associate himself with the qualities society allocates to him.

By trailblazing a path for others to follow, he does a great work for the political leaders and becomes a model of sacrifice. The Greco- Roman history is full of statues of people that simply acquired titles of Gods because they knew how to fight, betray others, and even eliminate entire kingdoms with their swords. This situation has allowed the redirection of humanity towards the idea of a dualistic march towards the future. The individual of today now links his progress to the external challenges he wins: conquering lands, having more gold, domineering others, or simply having more of what one identifies as representing value. The process that has led to the degeneration of the modern human being and reducing him to only con-sidering what he can see or touch has not been a simple process. The kingships that have invaded the Nile Valley since 1500 B.C. found themselves having to face the reality that politics and brutality alone cannot lead the conquered people to submission. After the understanding that the title of a Pharaoh is not simply a political post, they understood that as long as a human being will be obeying the laws that leads him to the Gods (the Seventy Seven commandments) it was practically impossible for politics to distract him. All of them talked about the supposed rigidity of spirituality, not because the Kemetic spirituality was not bringing to mankind the solutions to his profound preoccupations, but because it was not allowing the politics to rule mankind. For them, a solution was needed for this problem.

In the year 867 B.C., the Greeks announced the birth of a new God called Lieber. Lieber was defined as the God of human pleasures and social vices like drunkenness, homosexuality, sexual orgies, the breaking of all the rules that sets a human being apart from other animals. Everything that was considered a social vice and a spiritual abomination was considered what the God Lieber was offering. For them, the God Lieber came to free us from the tyra. y of Gods. For the Greek philosophers, there was an injustice in the fact that the human being was not enjoying the pleasures of the flesh and drunkenness to the extreme without having to worry about what the Gods are thinking. With the God Lieber, even dishonesty and crime were possible because Lieber will defend us in front of the other Gods.

The modern version of this concept is the Christian message saying that Jesus died for our sins.

The creation of the God Lieber was, in its time, a social revolution, Lieber has liberated the human being from the seventy-seven commandments and the doctrine through which one becomes the adepts of Lieber is called Liberty!

There is until today languages in European territory in which Lieber will signify love, sexuality, desire, pleasure, etc.

The word "lieber" nowadays became very popular. We use it to signify the absence of oppression or the ability to do whatever we want. We must accept that the introduction of Lieber is a very ingenious coup made against humanity. Every time we use the word liberty, it creates in us a sort of antipode, a place or an entity supposed antagonistic that we must combat. Through that fact, unknowingly, we have chosen values that we are defending; but spiritually we have rejected the Gods and the principles that lead us towards them.

We have chosen the bodily pleasures, drunkenness, and orgies.

This is another reason why ignorance is what destroys humanity.